---

UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS.
MASSES AND RADII OF THE PROTON, THE ELECTRON AND THE UNIVERSE.

By Louis Nielsen
http://www.rostra.dk/louis

THE ELECTRON IS COMPOSED OF MORE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES
In the following considerations I postulate that the real electron is
a quantum-dynamical system composed of a huge number of very tiny
energy-/matter quanta and that it has a physical average extension.
In the following I calculate that the average ‘radius’ of a real
electron is about 10^(-18) meter.

CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE ELECTRON, THE PROTON AND THE UNIVERSE
- Are there connections between the electron, the proton and the
Universe?
- My answer is: Yes.
I postulate that there exists a connection between the average mass-
density of the electron and the average mass-density of the
Universe. A similar connection exists between the average mass-
density of the proton and the average mass-density of the Universe.
The mathematical connections are given by the equations:

(1) (m(p)/r(p)^3) = N(p)*(M/R^3)

(2) (m(e)/r(e)^3) = N(e)*(M/R^3)

In equation (1) m(p) = 1.67*10^(-27) kg is the rest mass of the proton
and r(p) is the average radius of the proton.
In equation (2) m(e) = 9.11*10^(-31) kg is the rest mass of the
electron and r(e) is the average radius of the electron.
The quantity M is the total mass of the Universe and R is the actual
average radius of the Universe.
The quantity N(e) is equal to the ratio between the electrostatic and
gravitostatic forces between two electrons and N(p) is equal to the
ratio between the electrostatic and gravitostatic forces between two
protons.
The quantities N(e) and N(p) are defined by:

(3) N(p) = (k*e^2/G*m(p)^2) = 1.24*10^36


(4) N(e) = ((k*e^2)/(G*m(e)^2) = 4.16*10^42

In the equations (3) and (4) k is Coulomb's constant and e is the
electric charge of the electron. The quantity G is the value of
Newton's gravitational constant.

MASS-/RADIUS SYMMETRY BETWEEN THE PROTON AND THE ELECTRON
From the equations (1), (2), (3) and (4) we can derive the following
symmetry formula:

(5) m(p)/m(e) = r(p)/r(e)

The measured value of the mass ratio m(p)/m(e) = 1836.15.
From equation (5) we see that the average radius r(e) of the electron
is about 1836 times smaller than the average radius r(p) of the
proton.

UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS
I postulate the following connection between the actual average radius
R of the Universe and the total mass M of the Universe. (Please see
the link to my treatise “Quantum Cosmology”).

(6) R = N(e)^3*(h/(M*c))

In equation (6) h is Planck’s constant and c the velocity of light.
The equation (6) gives a unification of microphysics and
macrophysics.
From (1), (2), (3), (4) and (6) we can derive the following
connections between cosmological quantities and atomic quantities:

(7) r(p) = R*m(p)*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)

(8) r(e) = R*m(e) )*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)

(9) R = N(e)*((m(e)^2*h)/(m(p)^3*c))^(1/4)* (r(p))^(3/4)

(10) M = N(e)^3*(h/(R*c)

CALCULATIONS OF R AND M FROM ATOMIC QUANTITIES
With a measured mean value of the (mass) radius r(p) = 1.3*10^(-15)
meter of the proton we can calculate R and M from equation (9) and
(10). We get:

(9a) R = 1.3*10^26 meter

(10a) M = 1.2*10^60 kg

We can calculate the average radius of the electron r(e) from the
simple equation (5) but also from the equation (8) with the use of
(9a). We get:

(5a) r(e) = 7.0*10^(-19) meter

Experiments must be designed to measure the mean radius r(e) of the
electron and then it can be shown if the above connections between
macro-cosmos and micro-cosmos are right or false.

THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE
From the actual radius R of the Universe we can calculate the age T of
the Universe from the equation:

(11) T = R/c = 13.8*10^9 years = 13.8 billion years

The calculated age T of the Universe is in concordance with the actual
measured value.

Read more in my treatise:
http://www.rostra.dk/louis/

Comments to the above considerations are very welcome.

Best regards
Louis Nielsen
Denmark

---

Louis_N@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
> UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS.
> MASSES AND RADII OF THE PROTON, THE ELECTRON AND THE UNIVERSE.

> THE ELECTRON IS COMPOSED OF MORE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES

1) deep scattering experiments
2) idiot

[snip rest of crap]

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2

---

On 4 Aug., 00:56, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
> UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS.
> MASSES AND RADII OF THE PROTON, THE ELECTRON AND THE UNIVERSE.
>
> By Louis Nielsenhttp://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> THE ELECTRON IS COMPOSED OF MORE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES
> In the following considerations I postulate that the real electron is
> a quantum-dynamical system composed of a huge number of very tiny
> energy-/matter quanta and that it has a physical average extension.
> In the following I calculate that the average ‘radius’ of a real
> electron is about 10^(-18) meter.
>
> CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE ELECTRON, THE PROTON AND THE UNIVERSE
> - Are there connections between the electron, the proton and the
> Universe?
> - My answer is: Yes.
> I postulate that there exists a connection between the average mass-
> density of the electron and the   average mass-density of the
> Universe. A similar connection exists between the average mass-
> density of the proton and the average mass-density of the Universe.
> The mathematical connections are given by the equations:
>
> (1)   (m(p)/r(p)^3) = N(p)*(M/R^3)
>
> (2)   (m(e)/r(e)^3) = N(e)*(M/R^3)
>
> In equation (1) m(p) = 1.67*10^(-27) kg is the rest mass of the proton
> and r(p) is the average radius of the proton.
> In equation (2) m(e) = 9.11*10^(-31) kg is the rest mass of the
> electron and r(e) is the average radius of the electron.
> The quantity M is the total mass of the Universe and R is the actual
> average radius of the Universe.
> The quantity N(e) is equal to the ratio between the electrostatic and
> gravitostatic forces between two electrons and N(p) is equal to the
> ratio between the electrostatic and gravitostatic forces between two
> protons.
> The quantities N(e) and N(p) are defined by:
>
> (3)   N(p) = (k*e^2/G*m(p)^2) = 1.24*10^36
>
> (4)   N(e) = ((k*e^2)/(G*m(e)^2) = 4.16*10^42
>
> In the equations (3) and (4) k is Coulomb's constant and e is the
> electric charge of the electron. The quantity G is the value of
> Newton's gravitational constant.
>
> MASS-/RADIUS SYMMETRY BETWEEN THE PROTON AND THE ELECTRON
> From the equations (1), (2), (3) and (4) we can derive the following
> symmetry formula:
>
> (5)   m(p)/m(e) = r(p)/r(e)
>
> The measured value of the mass ratio m(p)/m(e) = 1836.15.
> From equation (5) we see that the average radius r(e) of the electron
> is about 1836 times smaller than the average radius r(p) of the
> proton.
>
> UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS
> I postulate the following connection between the actual average radius
> R of the Universe and the total mass M of the Universe. (Please see
> the link to my treatise “Quantum Cosmology”).
>
> (6)  R = N(e)^3*(h/(M*c))
>
> In equation (6) h is Planck’s constant and c the velocity of light.
> The equation (6) gives a unification of microphysics and
> macrophysics.
> From (1), (2), (3), (4) and (6) we can derive the following
> connections between cosmological quantities and atomic quantities:
>
> (7)   r(p) = R*m(p)*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)
>
> (8)   r(e) = R*m(e) )*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)
>
> (9)   R = N(e)*((m(e)^2*h)/(m(p)^3*c))^(1/4)* (r(p))^(3/4)
>
> (10)   M = N(e)^3*(h/(R*c)
>
> CALCULATIONS OF R AND M FROM ATOMIC QUANTITIES
> With a measured mean value of the (mass) radius r(p) = 1.3*10^(-15)
> meter of the proton we can calculate R and M from equation (9) and
> (10). We get:
>
> (9a)   R = 1.3*10^26 meter
>
> (10a)   M = 1.2*10^60 kg
>
> We can calculate the average radius of the electron r(e) from the
> simple equation (5) but also from the equation (8) with the use of
> (9a). We get:
>
> (5a)   r(e) = 7.0*10^(-19) meter
>
> Experiments must be designed to measure the mean radius r(e) of the
> electron and then it can be shown if the above connections between
> macro-cosmos and micro-cosmos are right or false.
>
> THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE
> From the actual radius R of the Universe we can calculate the age T of
> the Universe from the equation:
>
> (11)   T = R/c = 13.8*10^9 years = 13.8 billion years
>
> The calculated age T of the Universe is in concordance with the actual
> measured value.
>
> Read more in my treatise:http://www.rostra.dk/louis/
>
> Comments to the above considerations are very welcome.
>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmark

Hej alle!
Hermed en rettelse til ligningerne (7) og (8) i mit indlæg ’Forening
af Mikrokosmos og Makrokosmos’. Højre side af både ligning (7) og
ligning (8) skal ganges med faktoren (1/M)^(1/3), hvor M er Universets
totale masse.
De korrekte ligninger er:

(7) r(p) = R*m(p)*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3)

(8) r(e) = R*m(e) )*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3)

Hilsen fra
Louis Nielsen

---

<Louis_N@edu.herlufsholm.dk> skrev
news:1a0424c4-3fca-46a1-94aa-22b5325fec2f@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com

.... som et svar på tråden (der blev oprettet af ham selv) ...
news:8b86dd9f-eef1-4120-a752-24f570f281ef@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com

=== citat start ===

On 4 Aug., 00:56, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
> UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS.
> MASSES AND RADII OF THE PROTON, THE ELECTRON AND THE UNIVERSE.
>
> By Louis Nielsenhttp://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> THE ELECTRON IS COMPOSED OF MORE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES
> In the following considerations I postulate that the real electron is
> a quantum-dynamical system composed of a huge number of very tiny
> energy-/matter quanta and that it has a physical average extension.
> In the following I calculate that the average 'radius' of a real
> electron is about 10^(-18) meter.
>
> CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE ELECTRON, THE PROTON AND THE UNIVERSE
> - Are there connections between the electron, the proton and the
> Universe?
> - My answer is: Yes.
> I postulate that there exists a connection between the average mass-
> density of the electron and the average mass-density of the
> Universe. A similar connection exists between the average mass-
> density of the proton and the average mass-density of the Universe.
> The mathematical connections are given by the equations:
>
> (1) (m(p)/r(p)^3) = N(p)*(M/R^3)
>
> (2) (m(e)/r(e)^3) = N(e)*(M/R^3)
>
> In equation (1) m(p) = 1.67*10^(-27) kg is the rest mass of the proton
> and r(p) is the average radius of the proton.
> In equation (2) m(e) = 9.11*10^(-31) kg is the rest mass of the
> electron and r(e) is the average radius of the electron.
> The quantity M is the total mass of the Universe and R is the actual
> average radius of the Universe.
> The quantity N(e) is equal to the ratio between the electrostatic and
> gravitostatic forces between two electrons and N(p) is equal to the
> ratio between the electrostatic and gravitostatic forces between two
> protons.
> The quantities N(e) and N(p) are defined by:
>
> (3) N(p) = (k*e^2/G*m(p)^2) = 1.24*10^36
>
> (4) N(e) = ((k*e^2)/(G*m(e)^2) = 4.16*10^42
>
> In the equations (3) and (4) k is Coulomb's constant and e is the
> electric charge of the electron. The quantity G is the value of
> Newton's gravitational constant.
>
> MASS-/RADIUS SYMMETRY BETWEEN THE PROTON AND THE ELECTRON
> From the equations (1), (2), (3) and (4) we can derive the following
> symmetry formula:
>
> (5) m(p)/m(e) = r(p)/r(e)
>
> The measured value of the mass ratio m(p)/m(e) = 1836.15.
> From equation (5) we see that the average radius r(e) of the electron
> is about 1836 times smaller than the average radius r(p) of the
> proton.
>
> UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS
> I postulate the following connection between the actual average radius
> R of the Universe and the total mass M of the Universe. (Please see
> the link to my treatise "Quantum Cosmology").
>
> (6) R = N(e)^3*(h/(M*c))
>
> In equation (6) h is Planck's constant and c the velocity of light.
> The equation (6) gives a unification of microphysics and
> macrophysics.
> From (1), (2), (3), (4) and (6) we can derive the following
> connections between cosmological quantities and atomic quantities:
>
> (7) r(p) = R*m(p)*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)
>
> (8) r(e) = R*m(e) )*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)
>
> (9) R = N(e)*((m(e)^2*h)/(m(p)^3*c))^(1/4)* (r(p))^(3/4)
>
> (10) M = N(e)^3*(h/(R*c)
>
> CALCULATIONS OF R AND M FROM ATOMIC QUANTITIES
> With a measured mean value of the (mass) radius r(p) = 1.3*10^(-15)
> meter of the proton we can calculate R and M from equation (9) and
> (10). We get:
>
> (9a) R = 1.3*10^26 meter
>
> (10a) M = 1.2*10^60 kg
>
> We can calculate the average radius of the electron r(e) from the
> simple equation (5) but also from the equation (8) with the use of
> (9a). We get:
>
> (5a) r(e) = 7.0*10^(-19) meter
>
> Experiments must be designed to measure the mean radius r(e) of the
> electron and then it can be shown if the above connections between
> macro-cosmos and micro-cosmos are right or false.
>
> THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE
> From the actual radius R of the Universe we can calculate the age T of
> the Universe from the equation:
>
> (11) T = R/c = 13.8*10^9 years = 13.8 billion years
>
> The calculated age T of the Universe is in concordance with the actual
> measured value.
>
> Read more in my treatise:http://www.rostra.dk/louis/
>
> Comments to the above considerations are very welcome.
>
> Best regards
> Louis Nielsen
> Denmark

Hej alle!
Hermed en rettelse til ligningerne (7) og (8) i mit indlæg 'Forening
af Mikrokosmos og Makrokosmos'. Højre side af både ligning (7) og
ligning (8) skal ganges med faktoren (1/M)^(1/3), hvor M er Universets
totale masse.
De korrekte ligninger er:

(7) r(p) = R*m(p)*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3)

(8) r(e) = R*m(e) )*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3)

Hilsen fra
Louis Nielsen

=== citat slut ====


Interrupt from ...
7704 news:g6b1t1$23vh$1@newsbin.cybercity.dk
7705 news:g6b4bd$24o4$1@newsbin.cybercity.dk
>
> > > Electron
> > > Size < 10^-18 m
> > > ...
> > > Neutron and Proton
> > > Size (around) 10^-15 m


Compare with ...

> (5a) r(e) = 7.0*10^(-19) meter


Hmm ...

Og hvad nu hvis, apropos ...

> (5) m(p)/m(e) = r(p)/r(e)
>
> The measured value of the mass ratio m(p)/m(e) = 1836.15.
> From equation (5) we see that the average radius r(e) of the electron
> is about 1836 times smaller than the average radius r(p) of the
> proton.

... det viser sig - *hypotetisk* set - at en elektrons masse er på fx. det
dobbelte eller det halve.

Får det så nogen-som-helst indflydelse på dit beregnet resultat, Louis ?


(Årsagen til at jeg spørger, skyldes jo at jeg undersøger, *om* der evt.
allerede er et massetab i dannelsen af elektroner, protoner, neutroner m.m.)


Med venlig hilsen,
Mogens Kall, The servant of Michael, the *fool* of Christ.
--
Coming up news: Iran hit by a meteor. Iran is no more (Jer.49,34- Jos.10,11)
Last OUTPUT: 7743 news:g796ep$1ohq$1@newsbin.cybercity.dk
http://groups.google.dk/group/no.kultur.folklore.ufo/msg/5b001b21207d4ab4?
( http://groups.google.dk/group/no.kultur.folklore.ufo/ ). File-number: 7744

---

On 5 Aug., 11:47, "Jesus-loves-you" <John15...@1.John4.8.Heaven>
wrote:
> <Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk> skrevnews:1a0424c4-3fca-46a1-94aa-22b5325fec2f@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
>
> ... som et svar på tråden (der blev oprettet af ham selv) ...news:8b86dd9f-eef1-4120-a752-24f570f281ef@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
>
> === citat start ===
>
> On 4 Aug., 00:56, Loui...@edu.herlufsholm.dk wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS.
> > MASSES AND RADII OF THE PROTON, THE ELECTRON AND THE UNIVERSE.
>
> > By Louis Nielsenhttp://www.rostra.dk/louis
>
> > THE ELECTRON IS COMPOSED OF MORE FUNDAMENTAL PARTICLES
> > In the following considerations I postulate that the real electron is
> > a quantum-dynamical system composed of a huge number of very tiny
> > energy-/matter quanta and that it has a physical average extension.
> > In the following I calculate that the average 'radius' of a real
> > electron is about 10^(-18) meter.
>
> > CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE ELECTRON, THE PROTON AND THE UNIVERSE
> > - Are there connections between the electron, the proton and the
> > Universe?
> > - My answer is: Yes.
> > I postulate that there exists a connection between the average mass-
> > density of the electron and the average mass-density of the
> > Universe. A similar connection exists between the average mass-
> > density of the proton and the average mass-density of the Universe.
> > The mathematical connections are given by the equations:
>
> > (1) (m(p)/r(p)^3) = N(p)*(M/R^3)
>
> > (2) (m(e)/r(e)^3) = N(e)*(M/R^3)
>
> > In equation (1) m(p) = 1.67*10^(-27) kg is the rest mass of the proton
> > and r(p) is the average radius of the proton.
> > In equation (2) m(e) = 9.11*10^(-31) kg is the rest mass of the
> > electron and r(e) is the average radius of the electron.
> > The quantity M is the total mass of the Universe and R is the actual
> > average radius of the Universe.
> > The quantity N(e) is equal to the ratio between the electrostatic and
> > gravitostatic forces between two electrons and N(p) is equal to the
> > ratio between the electrostatic and gravitostatic forces between two
> > protons.
> > The quantities N(e) and N(p) are defined by:
>
> > (3) N(p) = (k*e^2/G*m(p)^2) = 1.24*10^36
>
> > (4) N(e) = ((k*e^2)/(G*m(e)^2) = 4.16*10^42
>
> > In the equations (3) and (4) k is Coulomb's constant and e is the
> > electric charge of the electron. The quantity G is the value of
> > Newton's gravitational constant.
>
> > MASS-/RADIUS SYMMETRY BETWEEN THE PROTON AND THE ELECTRON
> > From the equations (1), (2), (3) and (4) we can derive the following
> > symmetry formula:
>
> > (5) m(p)/m(e) = r(p)/r(e)
>
> > The measured value of the mass ratio m(p)/m(e) = 1836.15.
> > From equation (5) we see that the average radius r(e) of the electron
> > is about 1836 times smaller than the average radius r(p) of the
> > proton.
>
> > UNIFICATION OF MICROPHYSICS AND MACROPHYSICS
> > I postulate the following connection between the actual average radius
> > R of the Universe and the total mass M of the Universe. (Please see
> > the link to my treatise "Quantum Cosmology").
>
> > (6) R = N(e)^3*(h/(M*c))
>
> > In equation (6) h is Planck's constant and c the velocity of light.
> > The equation (6) gives a unification of microphysics and
> > macrophysics.
> > From (1), (2), (3), (4) and (6) we can derive the following
> > connections between cosmological quantities and atomic quantities:
>
> > (7) r(p) = R*m(p)*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3) (rettet)
>
> > (8) r(e) = R*m(e) )*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3) (rettet)
>
> > (9) R = N(e)*((m(e)^2*h)/(m(p)^3*c))^(1/4)* (r(p))^(3/4)
>
> > (10) M = N(e)^3*(h/(R*c)
>
> > CALCULATIONS OF R AND M FROM ATOMIC QUANTITIES
> > With a measured mean value of the (mass) radius r(p) = 1.3*10^(-15)
> > meter of the proton we can calculate R and M from equation (9) and
> > (10). We get:
>
> > (9a) R = 1.3*10^26 meter
>
> > (10a) M = 1.2*10^60 kg
>
> > We can calculate the average radius of the electron r(e) from the
> > simple equation (5) but also from the equation (8) with the use of
> > (9a). We get:
>
> > (5a) r(e) = 7.0*10^(-19) meter
>
> > Experiments must be designed to measure the mean radius r(e) of the
> > electron and then it can be shown if the above connections between
> > macro-cosmos and micro-cosmos are right or false.
>
> > THE AGE OF THE UNIVERSE
> > From the actual radius R of the Universe we can calculate the age T of
> > the Universe from the equation:
>
> > (11) T = R/c = 13.8*10^9 years = 13.8 billion years
>
> > The calculated age T of the Universe is in concordance with the actual
> > measured value.
>
> > Read more in my treatise:http://www.rostra.dk/louis/
>
> > Comments to the above considerations are very welcome.
>
> > Best regards
> > Louis Nielsen
> > Denmark
>
> Hej alle!
> Hermed en rettelse til ligningerne (7) og (8) i mit indlæg 'Forening
> af Mikrokosmos og Makrokosmos'. Højre side af både ligning (7) og
> ligning (8) skal ganges med faktoren (1/M)^(1/3), hvor M er Universets
> totale masse.
> De korrekte ligninger er:
>
> (7)  r(p) = R*m(p)*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3)
>
> (8)  r(e) = R*m(e) )*(G/(k*e^2))^(1/3)*(1/M)^(1/3)
>
> Hilsen fra
> Louis Nielsen
>
> === citat slut ====
>
> Interrupt from ...
> 7704news:g6b1t1$23vh$1@newsbin.cybercity.dk
> 7705news:g6b4bd$24o4$1@newsbin.cybercity.dk
>
>
>
> > > > Electron
> > > >     Size < 10^-18 m
> > > > ...
> > > > Neutron and Proton
> > > >     Size (around) 10^-15 m
>
> Compare with ...
>
> > (5a) r(e) = 7.0*10^(-19) meter
>
> Hmm ...
>
> Og hvad nu hvis, apropos ...
>
> > (5) m(p)/m(e) = r(p)/r(e)
>
> > The measured value of the mass ratio m(p)/m(e) = 1836.15.
> > From equation (5) we see that the average radius r(e) of the electron
> > is about 1836 times smaller than the average radius r(p) of the
> > proton.
>
> .. det viser sig - *hypotetisk* set - at en elektrons masse er på fx. det
> dobbelte eller det halve.
>
> Får det så nogen-som-helst indflydelse på dit beregnet resultat, Louis ?
>
> (Årsagen til at jeg spørger, skyldes jo at jeg undersøger, *om* der evt.
> allerede er et massetab i dannelsen af elektroner, protoner, neutroner m.m.)
>
> Med venlig hilsen,
> Mogens Kall, The servant of Michael, the *fool* of Christ.
> - Vis tekst i anførselstegn -

Hej Mogens,
Forsøg viser at m(p)/m(e) = 1836,15.
Umiddelbart vil 'det du undersøger' ikke ændre på de ligninger jeg har
opstillet. Dog fås så andre talværdier for M og R.

Hvad er det du undersøger med hensyn til dannelsen af elektroner,
protoner, neutroner m.m.?

Hilsen fra
Louis Nielsen

---

<Louis_N@edu.herlufsholm.dk> skrev
news:c249c9ea-8daa-410b-a0f5-3a8e7ea43cbf@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com

[ ... file 7744 ... ]

> > > > > Electron
> > > > > Size < 10^-18 m
> > > > > ...
> > > > > Neutron and Proton
> > > > > Size (around) 10^-15 m
> >
> > Compare with ...
> >
> > > (5a) r(e) = 7.0*10^(-19) meter
> >
> > Hmm ...
> >
> > Og hvad nu hvis, apropos ...
[ ... ]
> > .. det viser sig - *hypotetisk* set - at en elektrons masse er på fx.
> > det dobbelte eller det halve.
> >
> > Får det så nogen-som-helst indflydelse på dit beregnet resultat, Louis ?
> >
> > (Årsagen til at jeg spørger, skyldes jo at jeg undersøger, *om* der evt.
> > allerede er et massetab i dannelsen af elektroner, protoner, neutroner
> > m.m.)
[ ... ]
>
> Hej Mogens,
> Forsøg viser at m(p)/m(e) = 1836,15.
> Umiddelbart vil 'det du undersøger' ikke ændre på de ligninger jeg har
> opstillet. Dog fås så andre talværdier for M og R.

Nå. Det vil altså sige, at hvis der er et *forskelligt* massetab på
elektroner og protoner, da kommer det til at influere på resultatet dit!

>
> Hvad er det du undersøger med hensyn til dannelsen af elektroner,
> protoner, neutroner m.m.?

Øh ...

Det er desværre gået lidt i stampe ...

Teorien er - eller rettere sagt - hypotesen er, at selve begrebet masse
forårsaget af partikler (således som vi kender det fra hverdagen) er en
illusion. I virkeligheden er der tale om en art centrifugal-kræfter,
forårsaget af elektromagnetiske svingninger, som påvirker sig selv internt.

"Indicier" herpå er ...

1.
Dobbeltspalte-forsøget ...

Newsgroups: News:dk.videnskab
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007, CET 12:55, GMT 10:55
Subject: Dobbeltspalteforsøget (den såkaldte ikke-lokale virkelighed)
Was: Telepati (tankeoverføring)
7168 news:Ec2Pi.10$NK7.7@news.get2net.dk
>
> > > > > (vel og mærket altså på det subatomare plan).
> > >
> > > > Faktisk har man iagtaget det samme med forsøg med store
> > > > molekyler. ...
> > >
> > > Ja! - Det er jo dét, der er det groteske! - Store molekyler som
> > > *spredes* i tid og rum og så gendannes præcist, som de oprindelig var,
> > > oder was ?


2.
Massetab

Jeg kan konstatere, at der er et massetab ved fusion (fx. når H smelter
sammen til He), samtidig med at en proton (ved at afgive noget stof,
heriblandt fx. en positron) kunne ændres til en neutron, endskønt denne er
tungere (i fri tilstand). Ved henfald af isotoper kan neutroner ligeledes
(ved af afgive noget stof) ændres til protoner (i en atomkerne).


Derfor fik jeg tanken, at protoner og neutroner må være opbygget af
nogle mindre enheder, uden at jeg dog kan præcisere *hvad*. Pga.
beta-henfald kom ideen om, at elektroner og positroner måske tilsammen
udgjorde stoffet, hvorfor tallet på 1836,15 enheder i så fald måtte være
forkert, da det IKKE er et heltal.
Jeg beregnede derfor hvorledes massetabet kunne ændre sig, hvis man
antog, at protonen og neutronen i sig selv havde et massetab, og opstillede
tabeller, grafer m.m. mhp. at finde om muligt et pænt afrundet
elektron-enheds-tal, fx. på 1841 vægtenheder og så fremdeles.

Det blev også relevant at undersøge radius af en elektron, fordi hele
hypotesen bygger på, at elektronen består af en elektromagnetisk svingning,
som holder sig selv i en art "skak-mat", ved at svingningen drejer - om jeg
så må sige - ikke blot 90° (som tilfældet måske er i et ekstremt kraftigt
tyngdefelt) men hele 360°, således at de modsat rettede magnetiske og
elektriske kræfter *tiltrækker* hinanden (godt nok over meget, MEGET korte
afstande, som tilfældet måske ér i en partikel hen over midten, fra pol til
modpol via den *korteste* strækning gennem centrum; altså kernen i
partiklen).
Ved disharmoni undslap det "overskydne" energi feltet (den nåede ikke -
om jeg så må sige - at dreje hele de 360° rundt) i form af gamma-stråling,
hvorved henfaldet blev/bliver en realitet!!!


Håber du kan forstå disse mine snørklede ord (Sorry. Jeg er desværre ikke
fagmand, blot håbløs interesseret) ...

-

Et spørgsmål melder sig:

Kan dette forenes med din hypotese om et Univers-der-"smuldrer" ?

Tja ... Al energi kan vel koncentreres på et meget, meget lille areal,
antager jeg, apropos Big Bang -> Superstore elementer, såsom neutronstjerner
og Sorte Huller -> ... (und-so-weiter) ...


Med venlig hilsen,
Mogens Kall, The servant of Michael, the *fool* of Christ.
--
Coming up news: Iran hit by a meteor. Iran is no more (Jer.49,34- Jos.10,11)
Last OUTPUT: 7749 news:g7am38$2bfk$1@newsbin.cybercity.dk
http://groups.google.dk/group/no.kultur.folklore.ufo/msg/5b001b21207d4ab4?
( http://groups.google.dk/group/no.kultur.folklore.ufo/ ). File-number: 7750