/ Forside / Teknologi / Hardware / Mac / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Mac
#NavnPoint
UlrikB 4810
kipros 1675
Klaudi 1010
myg 920
pifo 907
Stouenberg 838
molokyle 830
Bille1948 815
rotw 760
10  EXTERMINA.. 750
Mere om USB vs FireWire
Fra : Peter Bjørn Perlsø


Dato : 03-07-06 23:55

Fra en debat på comp.sys.mac.advocacy:

(engelsk)


I don't think that USB is daisy-chainable except through a port. Ports
are said to be "cascadable", not daisy-chained, and 4 cascaded USB 2.0
ports seems to be the limit. In fact, the spec warns that some USB
devices might not work after going through just two ports. Ports are
needed because USB is not self-arbitrating and relies on the port to
re-calculate the end of the uframe for each transaction. Because of the
delay built-in to the port chip protocols between arbitrations, the more
ports one has, the slower the USB interface as these delays build up.
OTOH, Firewire is self arbitrating and Firewire devices CAN be connected
together in true daisy-chain configuration and up to 63 devices can be
connected in this manner as long as the total cable length doesn't
exceed a total length of 72 meters with 4.5 meters between devices.
Firewire can use repeaters to extend this range and number of attached
devices as well. Also Firewire is isochronous data which guarantees
speed irrespective of load and supports multiple hosts on the same
network (which USB CAN ALSO do with a special chipset, but those are as
rare as hen's teeth!).

George Graves



--
regards, Peter B. Perlsø - liberterran.org, siad.dk
"The politicians don't just want your money. They want your soul. They
want you to be worn down by taxes until you are dependent and helpless."
- James Dale Davidson, National Taxpayers Union

 
 
Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177505
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408554
Brugere : 218887

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste