Hvilken stinker. Men hvis man vil se en ufrivillig komisk film, er den
oplagt.
Stor produktion, gode skuespillere, interessant historie om tidsrejse. Men
hvad nytter dette hvis hele filmen falder til jorden med et brag pga
vanvittigt utroværdige CGI effekter?
Her er et morsomt udsnit af kommentarer fra brugere og anmeldere på IMDB:
"The use of the green screen was TERRIBLE!!! In one scene, they couldn't
sync up the speed of two characters walking with the speed of the sidewalk
going by."
"Imagine a film student who's learning to use CGI technology for the first
time. His final project in class is to create a full-length feature film
using everything he's learned in class the entire semester. His film would
be better than A Sound of Thunder."
"Folks, these are some of the worst green screens I've ever seen. My words
cannot do justice to how fake they looked. Some might even say they looked
faker than those things Pamela Anderson tries to pass off as breasts. When
you can tell that the actors are walking on a treadmill then you have
serious issues that are long past addressing."
"The first scene when the crew is shown in the past, there is a dinosaur
that is so poorly computer generated that its as if the movie Jurassic Park
had never been created."
"Many times my wife and I snickered as the FX were not much better than what
most any college kid with can do with their computer, a green blanket and a
MiniDV cam"
"So I saw a free screening of A SOUND OF THUNDER about six months ago. We
were told that the special effects were just "mock-ups" and therefore to not
judge those effects too harshly. And we were promised that for the actual
release the special effects would look spectacular. I just watched A SOUND
OF THUNDER on its opening Friday and the special effects were EXACTLY the
same."
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0318081/
Mvh
Zeki