/ Forside / Interesser / Dyr / Katte / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Katte
#NavnPoint
dova 9788
akle 7186
Jernladyen 3710
ans 2627
miritdk 2457
Nordsted1 2217
taliskoko 2188
mulberry 1779
cdripper 1530
10  HelleBirg.. 1440
To Mr. & Mrs Average pet-owner
Fra : Marianne Hellemose


Dato : 26-02-05 15:05

Denne dukkede op på en af mine lister og kastede lidt lys
over hvorfor personalet på internater engang imellem virker som om de har
lyst til at kvæle nogen


----
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Average Pet Owner:

Thank you for contacting us animal rescuers, shelter volunteers, and
foster-homes about your inability to keep your pet. We receive an
extremely high volume of inquiries and requests to accept surrendered
animals (and none of us is getting paid, OK?). To help us expedite
your problem as quickly as possible, please observe the following
guidelines:

1. Do not say that you are "CONSIDERING finding a good home" for your
pet, or that you, "feel you MIGHT be forced to," or that you "really
THINK it would be better if" you unloaded the poor beast. Ninety-five
percent of you have already got your minds stone-cold made up that the
animal WILL be out of your life by the weekend at the latest. Say so.
If you don't, I'm going to waste a lot of time giving you
common-sense, easy solutions for very fixable problems, and you're
going to waste a lot of time coming up with fanciful reasons why the
solution couldn't possibly work for you. For instance, you say the cat
claws the furniture, and I tell you about nail-clipping and scratching
posts and aversion training, and then you go into a long harangue
about how your husband won't let you put a scratching post in the
family room, and your ADHD daughter cries if you use a squirt bottle
on the cat, and your congenital thumb abnormalities prevent you from
using nail scissors and etc. Just say you're getting rid of the cat.

2. Do not waste time trying to convince me how nice and humane you
are. Your coworker recommended that you contact me because I am nice
to animals, not because I am nice to people, and I don't like people
who "get rid of" their animals. "Get rid of" is my least favorite
phrase in any language. I hope someone "gets rid of" YOU someday. I am
an animal advocate, not a people therapist. After all, for your ADHD
daughter, you can get counselors, special teachers, doctors, social
workers, etc. Your pet has only me, and people like me, to turn to in
his or her need, and we are unpaid, overworked, stressed-out, and
demoralized. So don't tell me this big long story about how, "We love
this dog so much, and we even bought him a special bed that cost $50,
and it is just KILLING us to part with him, but honestly, our maid is
just awash in dog hair every time she cleans, and his breath sometimes
just reeks of liver, so you can see how hard we've tried, and how dear
he is to us, but we really just can't..." You are not nice, and it is
not killing you. It is, in all probability, literally killing your
dog, but you're going to be just fine once the beast is out of your
sight. Don't waste my time trying to make me like you or feel sorry
for you in your plight.

3. Do not try to convince me that your pet is exceptional and deserves
special treatment. I don't care if you taught him to sit. I don't care
if she's a beautiful Persian. I have a waiting list of battered and/or
whacked-out animals who need help, and I have no room to foster-house
your pet. Do not send me long messages detailing how Fido just
l-o-v-e-s blankies and carries his favorite blankie everywhere, and
oh, when he gets all excited and happy, he spins around in circles,
isn't that cute? He really is darling, so it wouldn't be any trouble
at all for us to find him a good home. Listen, we can go down to the
pound and count the darling, spinning, blankie-loving beasts on death
row by the dozens, any day of the week. And, honey, Fido is a
six-year-old Shepherd-Lab mix. I am not lying when I tell you that
big, older, mixed-breed, garden-variety dogs are almost completely
unadoptable, and I don't care if they can whistle Dixie or send
semaphore signals with their blankies. What you don't realize is that,
though you're trying to lie to me, you're actually telling the truth:
Your pet is a special, wonderful, amazing creature. But this mean old
world does not care. More importantly, YOU do not care, and I can't
fix that problem. All I can do is grieve for all the exceptional
animals who live short, brutal, loveless lives and die without anyone
ever recognizing that they were indeed very, very special.

4. Finally, just, for God's sake, for the animal's sake, tell the
truth, and the whole truth. Do you think that if you just mumble that
your cat is "high-strung," I will say, "Okey-doke! No prob!" and take
it into foster care? No, I will start asking questions and uncover the
truth, which is that your cat has not used a litter box in the last
six months. Do not tell me that you "can't" crate your dog. I will ask
what happens when you try to crate him, and you will either be forced
to tell me the symptoms of full-blown, severe separation anxiety, or
else you will resort to lying some more, wasting more of our time.
And, if you succeed in placing your pet in a shelter or foster care,
do not tell yourself the biggest lie of all: "Those nice people will
take him and find him a good home, and everything will be fine." Those
nice people will indeed give the animal every possible chance, but if
we discover serious health or behavior problems, if we find that your
misguided attempts to train or discipline him have driven him over the
edge, we will do what you are too immoral and cowardly to do: We will
hold the animal in our arms, telling him truthfully that he is a good
dog or cat, telling him truthfully that we are sorry and we love him,
while the vet ends his life. How can we be so heartless as to kill
your pet, you ask? Do not ever dare to judge us. At least we tried. At
least we stuck with him to the end. At least we never abandoned him to
strangers, as you certainly did, didn't you? In short, this little old
rescuer/foster momma has reached the point where she would prefer you
pet owners to tell her stories like this: "We went to Wal-Mart and
picked up a free pet in the parking lot a couple of years ago. Now we
don't want it anymore. We're lazier than we thought. We've got no
patience either. We're starting to suspect the animal is really
smarter than we are, which is giving us self-esteem issues. Clearly,
we can't possibly keep it. Plus, it might be getting sick; it's acting
kind of funny. We would like you to take it in eagerly,
enthusiastically, and immediately. We hope you'll realize what a deal
you're getting and not ask us for a donation to help defray your
costs. After all, this is an (almost) pure-bred animal, and we'll send
the leftover food along with it. We get it at Wal-Mart too, and boy,
it's a really good deal, price-wise. We are very irritated that you
haven't shown pity on us in our great need and picked the animal up
already. We thought you people were supposed to be humane! Come and
get it today. No, we couldn't possibly bring it to you; the final
episode of "Survivor II" is on tonight."

Thank you, Mr. and Mrs. Pet Owner, for your cooperation. Author
Unknown, but could be any shelter worker or rescuer.
















--
Marianne Hellemose
***Ailurophil***

"the greatness of a nation and it's moral progress,
can be judged by how its animals are treated"
Mahatma Ghandi



 
 
Nina Søgaard (26-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Nina Søgaard


Dato : 26-02-05 16:17

> Marianne Hellemose skrev:
> Denne dukkede op på en af mine lister og kastede lidt lys
> over hvorfor personalet på internater engang imellem virker som om de har
> lyst til at kvæle nogen
>
>
> ----
> Dear Mr. and Mrs. Average Pet Owner:
>
> Thank you for contacting us animal rescuers, shelter volunteers, and
> foster-homes about your inability to keep your pet. We receive an
> extremely high volume of inquiries and requests to accept surrendered
> animals (and none of us is getting paid, OK?). To help us expedite
> your problem as quickly as possible, please observe the following
> guidelines:
>
> 1. Do not say that you are
> pet, or that you,
> THINK it would be better if
> percent of you have already got your minds stone-cold made up that the
> animal WILL be out of your life by the weekend at the latest. Say so.
> If you don't, I'm going to waste a lot of time giving you
> common-sense, easy solutions for very fixable problems, and you're
> going to waste a lot of time coming up with fanciful reasons why the
> solution couldn't possibly work for you. For instance, you say the cat
> claws the furniture, and I tell you about nail-clipping and scratching
> posts and aversion training, and then you go into a long harangue
> about how your husband won't let you put a scratching post in the
> family room, and your ADHD daughter cries if you use a squirt bottle
> on the cat, and your congenital thumb abnormalities prevent you from
> using nail scissors and etc. Just say you're getting rid of the cat.
>
> 2. Do not waste time trying to convince me how nice and humane you
> are. Your coworker recommended that you contact me because I am nice
> to animals, not because I am nice to people, and I don't like people
> who
> phrase in any language. I hope someone
> an animal advocate, not a people therapist. After all, for your ADHD
> daughter, you can get counselors, special teachers, doctors, social
> workers, etc. Your pet has only me, and people like me, to turn to in
> his or her need, and we are unpaid, overworked, stressed-out, and
> demoralized. So don't tell me this big long story about how,
> this dog so much, and we even bought him a special bed that cost $50,
> and it is just KILLING us to part with him, but honestly, our maid is
> just awash in dog hair every time she cleans, and his breath sometimes
> just reeks of liver, so you can see how hard we've tried, and how dear
> he is to us, but we really just can't...
> not killing you. It is, in all probability, literally killing your
> dog, but you're going to be just fine once the beast is out of your
> sight. Don't waste my time trying to make me like you or feel sorry
> for you in your plight.
>
> 3. Do not try to convince me that your pet is exceptional and deserves
> special treatment. I don't care if you taught him to sit. I don't care
> if she's a beautiful Persian. I have a waiting list of battered and/or
> whacked-out animals who need help, and I have no room to foster-house
> your pet. Do not send me long messages detailing how Fido just
> l-o-v-e-s blankies and carries his favorite blankie everywhere, and
> oh, when he gets all excited and happy, he spins around in circles,
> isn't that cute? He really is darling, so it wouldn't be any trouble
> at all for us to find him a good home. Listen, we can go down to the
> pound and count the darling, spinning, blankie-loving beasts on death
> row by the dozens, any day of the week. And, honey, Fido is a
> six-year-old Shepherd-Lab mix. I am not lying when I tell you that
> big, older, mixed-breed, garden-variety dogs are almost completely
> unadoptable, and I don't care if they can whistle Dixie or send
> semaphore signals with their blankies. What you don't realize is that,
> though you're trying to lie to me, you're actually telling the truth:
> Your pet is a special, wonderful, amazing creature. But this mean old
> world does not care. More importantly, YOU do not care, and I can't
> fix that problem. All I can do is grieve for all the exceptional
> animals who live short, brutal, loveless lives and die without anyone
> ever recognizing that they were indeed very, very special.
>
> 4. Finally, just, for God's sake, for the animal's sake, tell the
> truth, and the whole truth. Do you think that if you just mumble that
> your cat is
> it into foster care? No, I will start asking questions and uncover the
> truth, which is that your cat has not used a litter box in the last
> six months. Do not tell me that you
> what happens when you try to crate him, and you will either be forced
> to tell me the symptoms of full-blown, severe separation anxiety, or
> else you will resort to lying some more, wasting more of our time.
> And, if you succeed in placing your pet in a shelter or foster care,
> do not tell yourself the biggest lie of all:
> take him and find him a good home, and everything will be fine.
> nice people will indeed give the animal every possible chance, but if
> we discover serious health or behavior problems, if we find that your
> misguided attempts to train or discipline him have driven him over the
> edge, we will do what you are too immoral and cowardly to do: We will
> hold the animal in our arms, telling him truthfully that he is a good
> dog or cat, telling him truthfully that we are sorry and we love him,
> while the vet ends his life. How can we be so heartless as to kill
> your pet, you ask? Do not ever dare to judge us. At least we tried. At
> least we stuck with him to the end. At least we never abandoned him to
> strangers, as you certainly did, didn't you? In short, this little old
> rescuer/foster momma has reached the point where she would prefer you
> pet owners to tell her stories like this:
> picked up a free pet in the parking lot a couple of years ago. Now we
> don't want it anymore. We're lazier than we thought. We've got no
> patience either. We're starting to suspect the animal is really
> smarter than we are, which is giving us self-esteem issues. Clearly,
> we can't possibly keep it. Plus, it might be getting sick; it's acting
> kind of funny. We would like you to take it in eagerly,
> enthusiastically, and immediately. We hope you'll realize what a deal
> you're getting and not ask us for a donation to help defray your
> costs. After all, this is an (almost) pure-bred animal, and we'll send
> the leftover food along with it. We get it at Wal-Mart too, and boy,
> it's a really good deal, price-wise. We are very irritated that you
> haven't shown pity on us in our great need and picked the animal up
> already. We thought you people were supposed to be humane! Come and
> get it today. No, we couldn't possibly bring it to you; the final
> episode of
>
> Thank you, Mr. and Mrs. Pet Owner, for your cooperation. Author
> Unknown, but could be any shelter worker or rescuer.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Marianne Hellemose
> ***Ailurophil***
>
>
> can be judged by how its animals are treated
> Mahatma Ghandi
>
>

Puha, og føj hvor må det være svært at arbejde under de betingelser!!
Jeg kan lige forestille mig hvor svært det må være ikke at lade ens
virkelige følelser og tanker vælde ud over alle de mennesker der bare
losser dyrene af som affald.......... (jeg håber faktisk at personalet
indimellem lader det løbe af med sig
)


Med venlig hilsen
Nina Søgaard
- Tøm kattebakken ved privat svar
www.gentlespirit.dk

Postet fra http://www.dk-fritid-dyr-kat.dk


Denise (26-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Denise


Dato : 26-02-05 16:39

Marianne Hellemose wrote:
> Denne dukkede op på en af mine lister og kastede lidt lys
> over hvorfor personalet på internater engang imellem virker som om de
> har lyst til at kvæle nogen

Hej Marianne
Den var dælme god, sikken en opsang. Sikkert mange der har behov for den. Vi
skulle næsten få den oversat og så bruge den næste gang vi får en
halvkvædet vise (læs løgnehistorie), hvorfor nogle vil af med deres dyr.
Jeg tror jeg distribuerer den til andet forum, hvis det er ok.


--
Hilsen Denise
http://www.dk-fritid-dyr-kat.dk/sl.php?id=232



Marianne Hellemose (26-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Marianne Hellemose


Dato : 26-02-05 17:08

Denise skrev
<Jeg tror jeg distribuerer den til andet forum, hvis det er ok.>

Jamen det skal du være velkommen til, kan det få nogle til at tænke sig om
en ekstra gang er det jo fint. Nu er den lidt lang men man kunne nok
forkorte den lidt og stadig bevare meningen.



--
Marianne Hellemose
***Ailurophil***

"the greatness of a nation and it's moral progress,
can be judged by how its animals are treated"
Mahatma Ghandi



Denise (26-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Denise


Dato : 26-02-05 17:26

Marianne Hellemose wrote:
> Denise skrev
> <Jeg tror jeg distribuerer den til andet forum, hvis det er ok.>
>
> Jamen det skal du være velkommen til, kan det få nogle til at tænke
> sig om en ekstra gang er det jo fint. Nu er den lidt lang men man
> kunne nok forkorte den lidt og stadig bevare meningen.


Jo lang er den, men den er god synes jeg


--
Hilsen Denise
http://www.dk-fritid-dyr-kat.dk/sl.php?id=232



Nana Sørensen (26-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Nana Sørensen


Dato : 26-02-05 19:09


"Marianne Hellemose" <hellemose.som4@mail.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:42209ed5$0$228$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk...
> Denise skrev
> <Jeg tror jeg distribuerer den til andet forum, hvis det er ok.>
>
> Jamen det skal du være velkommen til, kan det få nogle til at tænke sig om
> en ekstra gang er det jo fint. Nu er den lidt lang men man kunne nok
> forkorte den lidt og stadig bevare meningen.
>
>
>
> --
> Marianne Hellemose
> ***Ailurophil***
>
>
>

Jeg prøver lige at se om jeg kan oversætte den. Jeg oversatte engang en
smule freelance, så det burde være muligt.
Jeg græd næsten, da jeg læste det.
Jeg snakkede engang med en pige, vis familie undredre sig dybt over, at alle
deres hunde (fem stk) havde været "sindssyge" og umulige at opdrage. Mens
jeg kendte hende, havde de to huunde, lige efter hinanden. Som de gik af
med, da de blev for store til at kunne håndteres. Jeg var ved at kaste op..



Leyna (27-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Leyna


Dato : 27-02-05 01:47

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:05:25 +0100, "Marianne Hellemose"
<hellemose.som4@mail.dk> wrote:


>Dear Mr. and Mrs. Average Pet Owner:

Nu ser jeg jo mig selv som "average pet owner", men denne opsang kan
jeg så ikke se skulle være rettet mod mig.

Når jeg sidder og kigger ind i min genbrugshund store brune øjne,
undrer det mig umådeligt at nogen overhovedet har kunne give slip på
ham. Når han smider sig ovenpå mig som en anden skødehund (han vejer
30kg+) og vender buden i vejret og "forlanger" at blive nusset, så
underer jeg mig igen, men allermest undrer jeg mig, når han sidder
lige på numsen med forbenene lige ud i vejret og "tigger" med det mest
bedebde blik.

Han kunne intet da jeg overtog ham 11 mdr. gammel. End ikke SIT kendte
han. I dag kan han sitte, dække, tigge/sidde pænt og så kan han hente
avisen. Han er sådan en glad, smuk og helt igennem skøn hund, og jeg
fatter ikke hvorfor han er landet her, men jeg vil ikke bytte ham for
noget!

Jeg har til gengæld også en genbrugskat, og hende fik jeg ikke fordi
der direkte var problemer med hende. De var skam glade nok for hende,
dér hvor hun kom fra, men hun var nederst i hierakiet (der var en
større katteflok) og hun trivedes slet ikke. Hun var asocial og
afviste enhver form for opmærsomhed. Derfor blev hun forsøgt
omplaceret, og i dag er hun en kælen, meget kælen og utrolig social
kat, så dér var det altså en omplacering der skulle til.

Jeg kan forestille mig at et dyr som man er glad for, men som
vantrives er svært at omplacere, for man er jo glad for dyret og ser
det jo helst hos en selv, men nogle gange ER det altså den bedste
løsning for dyret, og så skal man elske sine dyr nok til at være
villig til at give dem en chance et andet sted... og jeg regner mig
stadig som "gennemsnits dyreejer".
--
Leyna
Big Girls - Lidt mere end gennemsnittet.
http://www.big-girls.dk

Marianne Hellemose (27-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Marianne Hellemose


Dato : 27-02-05 09:13

Leyna skrev
<Nu ser jeg jo mig selv som "average pet owner", men denne opsang kan jeg så
ikke se skulle være rettet mod mig.>

Næh det er jeg ret sikker på at den ikke er min opfattelse af den
gennemsnits dyreejere som er omtalt,
så er det dem der bestemmer sig sig for at de ikke gider
bruge mere tid / penge på deres dyr. Dyret er blevet "besværligt", uvigtigt
og et irritationsmoment, passer måske ikke til de nye møbler, måske en
pludselig opstået allergi lige op til feriesæsonen osv osv.

Jeg er ret sikker på at den omtalte gennemsnits dyreejer _ikke_ bruger sin
tid på diverse dyregrupper, hverken for at lære mere eller dele deres
oplevelser med ligesindede. Så jeg vil påstå at også omking det at være
dyreejer passer din signatur glimrende *Lidt mere end gennemsnittet*


--
Marianne Hellemose
***Ailurophil***

"the greatness of a nation and it's moral progress,
can be judged by how its animals are treated"
Mahatma Ghandi



Leyna (27-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Leyna


Dato : 27-02-05 12:26

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:12:54 +0100, "Marianne Hellemose"
<hellemose.som4@mail.dk> wrote:

>min opfattelse af den
>gennemsnits dyreejere som er omtalt,
>så er det dem der bestemmer sig sig for at de ikke gider
>bruge mere tid / penge på deres dyr. Dyret er blevet "besværligt", uvigtigt
>og et irritationsmoment, passer måske ikke til de nye møbler, måske en
>pludselig opstået allergi lige op til feriesæsonen osv osv.

Nu sidder jeg så og føler mig temmelig naiv og blåøjet, for jeg vil
langt hellere tro på, at gennemsnits dyre-ejeren er lige så ansvarlig
som jeg selv er, og at grunden til at de anskaffer et dyr er
kærlighed. Dem der kasserer et dyr fordi det ikke er nuttet mere (det
holder de da aldrig op med?!) vil jeg helst ikke regne med til
gennemsnittet

Er "gennemsnittet" virkelig blevet så lavt, at dyr er blevet en "brug
og smid væk- ting"? I så fald står det sløjere til end jeg kan
forestille mig. *suk*

Min første hund var et arvestykke og ligeledes min første kat, så jeg
har ikke vlagt disse dyr, men glæden ved at få en glad,lydig og
absolut skøn hund ud af en 9-årig tæve, som aldrig har lært noget som
helst er ubeskrivelig.

Og Posie var ganske vist ikke den første kat jeg havde, men det var
lige så betagende at se denne "asociale" og underkuede kat vokse sig
stærk både fysisk og psykisk, og så skidt med at hun startede med at
overpisse (undskyld mit sprog) hjørnesofaen, så den måtte udskiftes,
eller at hun besørgede forskellige steder i huset hvor der IKKE var
nogen bakke. Det holdt jo op da hun blev tryg, og børn er jo heller
ikke renlige når man får dem, og dem smider man da ikke ud fordi de
ødelægger noget, vel?
>
>Jeg er ret sikker på at den omtalte gennemsnits dyreejer _ikke_ bruger sin
>tid på diverse dyregrupper, hverken for at lære mere eller dele deres
>oplevelser med ligesindede. Så jeg vil påstå at også omking det at være
>dyreejer passer din signatur glimrende *Lidt mere end gennemsnittet*

Hæ, min sig er nu sådan mere i "bred" forstand!
--
Leyna
Big Girls - Lidt mere end gennemsnittet.
http://www.big-girls.dk

Marianne Hellemose (27-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Marianne Hellemose


Dato : 27-02-05 12:42

Leyna skrev
<Nu sidder jeg så og føler mig temmelig naiv og blåøjet, for jeg vil langt
hellere tro på, at gennemsnits dyre-ejeren er lige så ansvarlig som jeg selv
er, >

Det kan jeg da godt forstå og det ville være rigtig dejligt
hvis det var sådan, måske har de sidste 8-10 år gjort mig for "kynisk" men
det er ikke den "virkelighed" jeg kender, desværre
--
Marianne Hellemose
***Ailurophil***

"the greatness of a nation and it's moral progress,
can be judged by how its animals are treated"
Mahatma Ghandi



Kate (27-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Kate


Dato : 27-02-05 09:39

Leyna <leyna@leyna.dk> wrote in
news:8c52211dehl4fit948bncv30g3v0988n8h@4ax.com:

> Jeg kan forestille mig at et dyr som man er glad for, men som
> vantrives er svært at omplacere, for man er jo glad for dyret og ser
> det jo helst hos en selv, men nogle gange ER det altså den bedste
> løsning for dyret, og så skal man elske sine dyr nok til at være
> villig til at give dem en chance et andet sted...

Det har du helt ret i. Kærlighed kan også være at give slip. Jeg sad
forleden og så en udsendelse fra Dansk Dyreværn Århus hvor en
dværgpincher var kommmet ind fordi den troede den var en rottweiler,
familien måtte vælge mellem den og deres gamle hund, fordi den lille
simpelthen tyraniserede den gamle. Historien viste med al tydelighed at
det var kærlighed til de to hunde der gjorde at den måtte af med en.
Hunden fik et dejligt nyt hjem og var rigtigt glad. Sådan er det
dejligt at se hjælpen blive brugt.

Jeg regner mig efterhånden ikke mere som "gennemsnitlig dyreejer" hvis
en sådan er en som anskaffer sig dyr og sender dem væk igen når de "er
i vejen". Desværre kender jeg flere eksempler på at "det er jo bare et
dyr", jeg hader det og må nogle gange bide mig i tungen for ikke at
sige noget grimt. Senest til to kolleger, hvor en fik aflivet sin 6 år
gamle kat fordi kæresten var allergisk, men først skulle de igennem at
få 2 andre som måtte afhændes igen Jeg bliver bare så vred. Det er
iorden at man kan komme i en situation hvor man ikke kan have sit dyr,
men anskaffe først en ekstra kat, siden en mere, velvidende at han er
allergisk, det gør mig rigtigt gal.
Den anden vil flytte fra sin lejlighed fordi hun bor ret langt fra sit
arbejde. Hun kan ikke have katten med og hvad er mere naturligt end at
jeg da selvfølgeligt tager hendes kat "ellers skal den aflives".
Hvorfor skal det være mit problem? Det kunne hun jo ikke svare på.
Helt fra da jeg ville flytte fra Måløv sagde jeg, jeg flytter ingen
steder uden kattene. Havde jeg ikke fået lejligheden i Rødovre var jeg
sikkert blevet boende i Måløv, kattene er mine venner og dem svigter
jeg ikke!

--
Kate

http://www.dk-fritid-dyr-kat.dk/sl.php?id=239

Ved privat svar fjern spamme.
If you want to reach me remove spamme.

Leyna (27-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Leyna


Dato : 27-02-05 12:34

On 27 Feb 2005 08:39:16 GMT, Kate <km1111dljspamme@oliwer.dk> wrote:

>Leyna <leyna@leyna.dk> wrote in
>news:8c52211dehl4fit948bncv30g3v0988n8h@4ax.com:
>
>> Jeg kan forestille mig at et dyr som man er glad for, men som
>> vantrives er svært at omplacere, for man er jo glad for dyret og ser
>> det jo helst hos en selv, men nogle gange ER det altså den bedste
>> løsning for dyret, og så skal man elske sine dyr nok til at være
>> villig til at give dem en chance et andet sted...
>
>Det har du helt ret i. Kærlighed kan også være at give slip. Jeg sad
>forleden og så en udsendelse fra Dansk Dyreværn Århus hvor en
>dværgpincher var kommmet ind fordi den troede den var en rottweiler,
>familien måtte vælge mellem den og deres gamle hund, fordi den lille
>simpelthen tyraniserede den gamle.

Her var det nok omvendt. Jeg havde i lang tid haft en drøm om at mine
hunde og katte skulle kunne sove sammen, nusse sammen, eller i det
mindste bare komme ind til os (mennesker og hunde) i stuerne, men
kattene holdt sig stædigt til baggang og soveværelse. Den eneste kat
der kom ind i stuerne var Mini, som jeg mistede sidste år.

Jeg ved ikke om det er mig der har været blind overfor det, men Mini
har åbenbart styret hele flokken med hård pote, for efter at hun er
væk, så fungerer flokken perfekt. De to sidste katte kommer ofte ind,
og specielt hankatten er ikke bange for noget som helst - heller ikke
når de to store hunde lige skal undersøge ham og/eller "nusse" ham.
(De "nusser" temmelig voldsomt, synes jeg, men katten ser ud til at
nyde det.)

Når jeg ser tilbage på det i dag, ville Mini sikkert ha' haft det
langt bedre hos en ældre enlig, som ikke havde andet at gå op i og
ikke havde nogle andre dyr overhovedet. Hun fyldte alt, alt for meget
i flokken, og så var hun jo yndlingskatten. Ak ja, måske jeg alligevel
hører til det "gennemsnit" som er både blinde og døve!
--
Leyna
Big Girls - Lidt mere end gennemsnittet.
http://www.big-girls.dk

Kate (28-02-2005)
Kommentar
Fra : Kate


Dato : 28-02-05 21:25

Leyna <leyna@leyna.dk> wrote in
news:kkb321lc6mm002ob8mu6fa5alnefdg544j@4ax.com:

> Når jeg ser tilbage på det i dag, ville Mini sikkert ha' haft det
> langt bedre hos en ældre enlig, som ikke havde andet at gå op i og
> ikke havde nogle andre dyr overhovedet. Hun fyldte alt, alt for
> meget i flokken, og så var hun jo yndlingskatten. Ak ja, måske jeg
> alligevel hører til det "gennemsnit" som er både blinde og døve!

Jeg er også en af dem som er utroligt bagklog Sofie ville i
virkeligheden have haft bedst af at være enekat, men det kunne jeg ikke
se for bare kærlighed til hende. Hun var en meget reserveret kat, men
hvis jeg tog hende rigtigt var hun også en ret kælen kat. Hun var altid
venligheden selv overfor mig, men hun havde det svært med Oliwer og
Johan. Meget af det forstod jeg først sent, da jeg havde fået Lante og
siden Mowgli. Specielt Mowgli har nok åbnet mine øjne, også i relation
til Oliwer og hans vanskeligheder.

Ofte har jeg fået ros af andre fordi jeg accepterede Oliwers uvane med
at skide på badeværelsesgulvet, jeg syntes ikke jeg behøvede ros for
jeg elskede jo kræet alligevel og ville aldrig have kunnet skille mig
af med ham, men det viste mig især at han ville have haft trange kår i
et andet hjem.

Som Marianne skriver, nej, jeg tror heller ikke medlemmer af dette og
lignede fora er gennemsnitlige dyreejere, vi har en helt anden
kærlighed til vores dyr.

--
Kate

http://www.dk-fritid-dyr-kat.dk/sl.php?id=239

Ved privat svar fjern spamme.
If you want to reach me remove spamme.

Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177560
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408941
Brugere : 218888

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste