Tommy Oksen <tommy.oksen@image.dk> wrote:
> Hej,
> jeg har tænkt mig at købe et Canon Powershot G5 hos PhotoShop
> Denmark Aps.
>
> Er der noget der taler imod nævnte produkt ?
<
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/powershot_g5-review/index.shtml
>
<
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canong5/page17.asp>
Konklusionen om S50 er også interessant læsning:
"Lets be honest I think we all expect more from Canon than to simply
bolt a larger sensor into an existing design, but that's exactly what
they did with the G5 and the S50. And what's the reasoning behind this?
Market pressure. Both the G3 and S45 are excellent cameras which get the
absolute maximum out of their four megapixel sensors, produce very nice
images without too many undesirable artifacts. Indeed in my opinion
nobody actually needs a five megapixel compact camera, it's just a case
of 'bigger must be better' (I'm sure we can thank some retailers for
this).
While it's true that the S50 carries all of the excellent features,
control and image processing from the S45 it can't be said that the lens
is as good a match for the sensor as it was with the four megapixel
unit. This is clearly visible in the strong chromatic aberrations which
can occur (this is the same thing we experienced with the G5). This is
the reason I can't give this camera 'Highly Recommended'.
Enough complaining, the S50 is a very capable digital camera with good
resolution a huge feature set well beyond its 'compact' label, it also
feels responsive and works well as a photographic tool. There's little
doubt that if you really feel-the-need for a five megapixel compact then
the S50 should be on your short list. Unfortunately I feel that Canon
has lost a little of its focus with the production of the S50 and G5. A
company with such a dominant market position should be braver."
<
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canons50/page16.asp>
--
Henrik Münster
Esbjerg
Danmark