---

http://home.pacbell.net/mrlycan/blink_index.htm

---

> http://home.pacbell.net/mrlycan/blink_index.htm

De bedste af disse skud viser tydeligt, at man ikke kan købe sig til grej,
der giver et godt resultat.

ab

---

"Marty" <mrlycan@pacbell.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:e96ce422.0209172044.dcb6e69@posting.google.com...
> http://home.pacbell.net/mrlycan/blink_index.htm

Føj for en dårlig billedkvalitet!

---

On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:49:59 +0200, "Per Kristensen" <pzk@crayon.dk>
wrote:

>"Marty" <mrlycan@pacbell.net> skrev i en meddelelse
>news:e96ce422.0209172044.dcb6e69@posting.google.com...
>> http://home.pacbell.net/mrlycan/blink_index.htm
>
>Føj for en dårlig billedkvalitet!
>
og føj for et prisbilligt kamera.............

---

Marty wrote:
>
> http://home.pacbell.net/mrlycan/blink_index.htm


Tak - jeg synes det var pændende at se det digitale svar på lomografi,
billederne får mig til at tænke på, at man indenfor stilbillede
fotografi også kan arbejde efter dogme konceptet...:)

--
| Med venlig hilsen - Niels Riis Ebbesen |
| http://www.niels-ebbesen.net - Free-lance grafik & webdesign |
| http://www.photo-gallery.dk - Skandinaviens største fotoarkiv |
| http://home3.inet.tele.dk/elgo - Links til alverdens søgemaskiner |

---

Thanks for all of your comments (I think :) - since I don't speak
Danish, I hope I inferred the correct content). Certainly the camera
is cheap - that is the point! It is kind of a digital 'pin-hole'
camera with infinite depth-of-field and a distinct lack of sharpness.
I have a good SLR, but this is a fun camera that sometimes, to my
mind, results in interesting effects and allows a different
perspective on digital photography. Regards, Marty