S. A. Thomsen wrote:
> On Sat, 24 May 2008 08:46:29 +0200, Vidal <vidal@webspeed.dk> wrote:
>
>> " ... Analyses of the ice cores from Antarctica show
>> that the curve for methane matches the temperature curve -
>> when the climate is cold, there is less methane in the
>> atmosphere. The measurements indicate a strong relationship
>> between the atmospheric methane content in relation to the
>> Earth's path around the Sun as well as the inclination and
>> direction of the Earth's axis."
>>
>>
http://www.nbi.ku.dk/english/news/greenhouse_gases/
>>
>> - og her:
>>
>> "The temperature curve over the past 800,000 years
>> matches the CO2 curve beautifully - during glacial periods
>> in which the climate is cold, there is less CO2 in the
>> atmosphere," says Professor Thomas Blunier from the Centre
>> for Ice and Climate at the Niels Bohr Institute, University
>> of Copenhagen. ..."
>
> Du glemte lige fortsættelsen:
>
> "He explains that when it is cold there is less plant growth, and so
> there are fewer plants to absorb the CO2 from the air, while more CO2
> is absorbed in the oceans, so the final calculation is a low CO2
> content in the atmosphere during glacial periods."
>
> Det er altså temperaturen der forårsager ændringen af CO2 i
> atmosfæren, IKKE omvendt...
Du fatter minus. Det er jo ikke det han siger.
Det man skal have med, når man læser den slags, er almen viden indenfor
videnskab
At give "temperaturen" æren for ændring i CO2, og dermed klimaforandringer,
er som at give dyrepasseren æren for tigerens striber.