/ Forside / Interesser / Andre interesser / Politik / Nyhedsindlæg
Login
Glemt dit kodeord?
Brugernavn

Kodeord


Reklame
Top 10 brugere
Politik
#NavnPoint
vagnr 20140
molokyle 5006
Kaptajn-T.. 4653
granner01 2856
jqb 2594
3773 2444
o.v.n. 2373
Nordsted1 2327
creamygirl 2320
10  ans 2208
Mr. Barak's postponement will come at a pr~
Fra : steen hjortsø


Dato : 13-05-08 06:38


Discretion is normally considered a vital instinct for a secretary of
defense. Thus asked about possible actions against Iran by the IDF,
Mr. Barak replies: “the only thing we shouldn’t do is talk about it.”

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3539301,00.html

But what is behind secretary Barak’s discretion in this case ? The
dire truth is that prevention or at least postponement of the
impending big war in the Middle East as desired by Mr. Barak is
utterly convenient to the Israeli – and American – governments but
certainly not to the Israeli people.

As it appears from the excerpt below, the big one = Doomsday will, in
principle, result in zero = 0 Israeli casualties, whereas one, two or
three years of continued “testings” of Hizbollah and Hamas rockets
would result in scores or hundreds if not thousands of casualties
among the Israeli civilian population.

I do not deny that the actions and omissions of the powerful Israeli
government may be one of the factors which have an influence on, e.g.
postponement of the exact date when Doomsday occurs, but, I repeat, a
postponement is certainly not in the true interest of the Israeli
people.

For a detailed explanation of the above considerations, see the
following excerpt from my book ‘After Doomsday: World War III and the
Triple Revolution’ Copenhagen 2006:

At the turn of the millennium it was the common opinion among
political scientists that the era of revolution, at least in the
heartland of advanced industrial democracies, was
drawing to a close.

Now, a mere half decade later, an entirely different picture, the
contours of war and war’s well-known connection with revolution begin
to loom large. There is no getting round the fact that we are still,
in 2006, under the spell of the ever rising tension in the Middle East
invariably reverberating around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Add to this the newest threat, the current insidious proliferation of
nuclear arms in the
Middle East and their means of delivery which we have reason to
suspect submit to an
anti-Western rancour more akin to religious fanaticism and even -
state-sponsored -,
terrorism than to political and military rationales similar to those
of the Cold War.

With these ominous developments and failing the cogent constraints of
the confrontation between NATO and the now defunct Warsaw Pact, how on
earth should
we be able to cherish a reasonable hope of avoiding nuclear war in
this rampant,
intricate and glaringly asymmetric reality? The inevitable and obvious
answer is: we
can’t!

Does this finally force us to deduce that our global civilization,
comprised of a mere 5,000 years in comparison to the 4.569 billion
years our planet has existed, was an ephemeral, flawed design doomed
to certain ruin once the stage of nuclear arms
was reached? Hardly, for that man is too tenacious, his intelligence
too developed to
cow once roused by the prospect of transcending Doomsday itself.

As might be expected, deeply serious discussions of a possible
survival of our
civilization after a nuclear disaster started in the early 1960s at
which time it finally
dawned on those circles who were developing the nuclear means to
realize a global
atomic war, that the similarity between the prospective World War III
and Doomsday as
described in both the Bible and the Koran was so remarkable that
closer scrutiny was
required.

The summoned physicists introduced the idea of a time reversal and
time rereversal
producing not one, but two stupefying messages:

1. a message of survival of our global civilization.

2. a message of the interference of – ’God’ – becoming an ETI
(extraterrestrial
intelligence) concurrently with the transformation of Doomsday to the
more mundane but not less gruesome reality of World War III.

The theoretical physicists realized that the use of nuclear arms in WW
III would indeed
ignite the atmosphere as feared by Edward Teller and Robert
Oppenheimer when
considering the use of the first atomic bomb.

Ignition of the atmosphere did not occur in the isolated atomic
bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but it will happen with the huge
release of energy from 10 or perhaps as many as 20 large nuclear and
hydrogen bombs in and around the world’s megalopolises leading to a
unique global homogeneous, and inconclusive, plasma
state with a strong inherent tendency to come back to the starting
point of the normal
state, or in theoretical physical terms: a coherent global plasma
state involving a time
reversal and an ensuing time re-reversal negating the entire WW III
and saving
everybody’s lives.

Considering one nuclear detonation in 1945, it was realized that the
pressure in
and around the fireball of a single detonating bomb would be too small
to ignite the
atmosphere, to say nothing of letting a possible ignition propagate
through it. This
barrier to propagation is eliminated, when simultaneous nuclear
detonations are piled
on top of each other like the plastic domes of ‘ludo pieces’ creating
a massive localised
pressure – and ignition of the atmosphere.

When you then stack one pile of detonating nuclear ‘ludo pieces’
beside another, then
a third, a fourth and so on, a strong propagation vector is achieved
and sustained and
continuous ignition of the atmosphere ensured. Such ignition processes
will actually
encircle the planet on Doomsday emanating from many different ignition
locations.

From the beginning of the 1960s, it was realized in NSA and KGB
circles that they had just deciphered the biblical message about
Doomsday they were destined to penetrate the moment when their
employers had become capable of staging a nuclear Doomsday and that
Doomsday from that point on could never more be sidetracked to a
difficultly comprehensible, apocalyptic séance of interest and
credulity only to orthodox
religious communities.

Considering themselves a distinguished elite (’The Chosen’) in the
habit of academics flattered to be invited to join the intelligence
service – instead of realizing the inescapable devaluation of their
position to the convenient tools of tyrants, on a par
with the downgrading of ‘God’ to a mere ETI - it must have been
essential for the self-image of these people that their privileged
position enabled them to conjecture, based
on the biblical text, that technical and theoretical physical
possibilities would be
available on Doomsday to present the entire global civilization to
much more than a
meaningless carnage, indeed to its eye-catching negation, the
transcendence of
sacrifice.

The central axis passing through the Judaic-Christian civilization is
identified as the progressive transcendence of sacrifice illustrated
by the pseudosacrifices of Isaac, Jesus, and Messiah. Beyond the signs
and wonders in the Revelation (of John of Patmos), the Revelation, the
last book in the Bible, is a vision of Doomsday, the heavenly
Jerusalem, and the pseudo-sacrifice of Messiah.

Whereas the Cold War only lasted until 1991, the huge number of
nuclear arms
developed throughout four decades persisted for another decade and a
half, although
their use in 200?, the anticipated year of Doomsday, will definitively
confirm their long
suspected inapplicability in war revealing the quite different not to
say paradoxical
objective they were bound for: that of securing common survival.

Steen Hjortsoe

 
 
Frank Leegaard (13-05-2008)
Kommentar
Fra : Frank Leegaard


Dato : 13-05-08 15:50

steen hjortsø wrote:
> Discretion is normally considered a vital instinct for a secretary of
> defense. Thus asked about possible actions against Iran by the IDF,
> Mr. Barak replies: “the only thing we shouldn’t do is talk about it.”
>
> http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3539301,00.html
>
> But what is behind secretary Barak’s discretion in this case ? The
> dire truth is that prevention or at least postponement of the
> impending big war in the Middle East as desired by Mr. Barak is
> utterly convenient to the Israeli – and American – governments but
> certainly not to the Israeli people.
>
> As it appears from the excerpt below, the big one = Doomsday will, in
> principle, result in zero = 0 Israeli casualties, whereas one, two or
> three years of continued “testings” of Hizbollah and Hamas rockets
> would result in scores or hundreds if not thousands of casualties
> among the Israeli civilian population.
>
> I do not deny that the actions and omissions of the powerful Israeli
> government may be one of the factors which have an influence on, e.g.
> postponement of the exact date when Doomsday occurs, but, I repeat, a
> postponement is certainly not in the true interest of the Israeli
> people.
>
> For a detailed explanation of the above considerations, see the
> following excerpt from my book ‘After Doomsday: World War III and the
> Triple Revolution’ Copenhagen 2006:
>
> At the turn of the millennium it was the common opinion among
> political scientists that the era of revolution, at least in the
> heartland of advanced industrial democracies, was
> drawing to a close.
>
> Now, a mere half decade later, an entirely different picture, the
> contours of war and war’s well-known connection with revolution begin
> to loom large. There is no getting round the fact that we are still,
> in 2006, under the spell of the ever rising tension in the Middle East
> invariably reverberating around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
>
> Add to this the newest threat, the current insidious proliferation of
> nuclear arms in the
> Middle East and their means of delivery which we have reason to
> suspect submit to an
> anti-Western rancour more akin to religious fanaticism and even -
> state-sponsored -,
> terrorism than to political and military rationales similar to those
> of the Cold War.
>
> With these ominous developments and failing the cogent constraints of
> the confrontation between NATO and the now defunct Warsaw Pact, how on
> earth should
> we be able to cherish a reasonable hope of avoiding nuclear war in
> this rampant,
> intricate and glaringly asymmetric reality? The inevitable and obvious
> answer is: we
> can’t!
>
> Does this finally force us to deduce that our global civilization,
> comprised of a mere 5,000 years in comparison to the 4.569 billion
> years our planet has existed, was an ephemeral, flawed design doomed
> to certain ruin once the stage of nuclear arms
> was reached? Hardly, for that man is too tenacious, his intelligence
> too developed to
> cow once roused by the prospect of transcending Doomsday itself.
>
> As might be expected, deeply serious discussions of a possible
> survival of our
> civilization after a nuclear disaster started in the early 1960s at
> which time it finally
> dawned on those circles who were developing the nuclear means to
> realize a global
> atomic war, that the similarity between the prospective World War III
> and Doomsday as
> described in both the Bible and the Koran was so remarkable that
> closer scrutiny was
> required.
>
> The summoned physicists introduced the idea of a time reversal and
> time rereversal
> producing not one, but two stupefying messages:
>
> 1. a message of survival of our global civilization.
>
> 2. a message of the interference of – ’God’ – becoming an ETI
> (extraterrestrial
> intelligence) concurrently with the transformation of Doomsday to the
> more mundane but not less gruesome reality of World War III.
>
> The theoretical physicists realized that the use of nuclear arms in WW
> III would indeed
> ignite the atmosphere as feared by Edward Teller and Robert
> Oppenheimer when
> considering the use of the first atomic bomb.
>
> Ignition of the atmosphere did not occur in the isolated atomic
> bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but it will happen with the huge
> release of energy from 10 or perhaps as many as 20 large nuclear and
> hydrogen bombs in and around the world’s megalopolises leading to a
> unique global homogeneous, and inconclusive, plasma
> state with a strong inherent tendency to come back to the starting
> point of the normal
> state, or in theoretical physical terms: a coherent global plasma
> state involving a time
> reversal and an ensuing time re-reversal negating the entire WW III
> and saving
> everybody’s lives.
>
> Considering one nuclear detonation in 1945, it was realized that the
> pressure in
> and around the fireball of a single detonating bomb would be too small
> to ignite the
> atmosphere, to say nothing of letting a possible ignition propagate
> through it. This
> barrier to propagation is eliminated, when simultaneous nuclear
> detonations are piled
> on top of each other like the plastic domes of ‘ludo pieces’ creating
> a massive localised
> pressure – and ignition of the atmosphere.
>
> When you then stack one pile of detonating nuclear ‘ludo pieces’
> beside another, then
> a third, a fourth and so on, a strong propagation vector is achieved
> and sustained and
> continuous ignition of the atmosphere ensured. Such ignition processes
> will actually
> encircle the planet on Doomsday emanating from many different ignition
> locations.
>
> From the beginning of the 1960s, it was realized in NSA and KGB
> circles that they had just deciphered the biblical message about
> Doomsday they were destined to penetrate the moment when their
> employers had become capable of staging a nuclear Doomsday and that
> Doomsday from that point on could never more be sidetracked to a
> difficultly comprehensible, apocalyptic séance of interest and
> credulity only to orthodox
> religious communities.
>
> Considering themselves a distinguished elite (’The Chosen’) in the
> habit of academics flattered to be invited to join the intelligence
> service – instead of realizing the inescapable devaluation of their
> position to the convenient tools of tyrants, on a par
> with the downgrading of ‘God’ to a mere ETI - it must have been
> essential for the self-image of these people that their privileged
> position enabled them to conjecture, based
> on the biblical text, that technical and theoretical physical
> possibilities would be
> available on Doomsday to present the entire global civilization to
> much more than a
> meaningless carnage, indeed to its eye-catching negation, the
> transcendence of
> sacrifice.
>
> The central axis passing through the Judaic-Christian civilization is
> identified as the progressive transcendence of sacrifice illustrated
> by the pseudosacrifices of Isaac, Jesus, and Messiah. Beyond the signs
> and wonders in the Revelation (of John of Patmos), the Revelation, the
> last book in the Bible, is a vision of Doomsday, the heavenly
> Jerusalem, and the pseudo-sacrifice of Messiah.
>
> Whereas the Cold War only lasted until 1991, the huge number of
> nuclear arms
> developed throughout four decades persisted for another decade and a
> half, although
> their use in 200?, the anticipated year of Doomsday, will definitively
> confirm their long
> suspected inapplicability in war revealing the quite different not to
> say paradoxical
> objective they were bound for: that of securing common survival.
>

Jeg synes du har vrøvl med leverancerne.

Du lovede allerede at levere dommedag for et par år siden.

Siden er leverancerne udeblevet


/F



ab© (13-05-2008)
Kommentar
Fra : ab©


Dato : 13-05-08 17:19


"Frank Leegaard" <frankFJERN@superbruger.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
news:4829aa82$0$15880$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
> steen hjortsø wrote:
>> Discretion is normally .../klip
>
> Jeg synes du har vrøvl med leverancerne.
> ....

Synes at det ser ud som om, at du ikke kan finde ud af at klippe det væk, du
ikke svarer på ?

Den måde at føre sig frem på, er der vel ikke meget "superbruger" ved ?

ab©



Frank Leegaard (13-05-2008)
Kommentar
Fra : Frank Leegaard


Dato : 13-05-08 20:29

ab© wrote:
> "Frank Leegaard" <frankFJERN@superbruger.dk> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:4829aa82$0$15880$edfadb0f@dtext01.news.tele.dk...
>> steen hjortsø wrote:
>>> Discretion is normally .../klip
>>
>> Jeg synes du har vrøvl med leverancerne.
>> ....
>
> Synes at det ser ud som om, at du ikke kan finde ud af at klippe det
> væk, du ikke svarer på ?
>
> Den måde at føre sig frem på, er der vel ikke meget "superbruger" ved
> ?
> ab©

Det er der netop. Alle no-archiveskvattene skal ikke have det for let.

/F



Søg
Reklame
Statistik
Spørgsmål : 177558
Tips : 31968
Nyheder : 719565
Indlæg : 6408893
Brugere : 218888

Månedens bedste
Årets bedste
Sidste års bedste